Academic research relating to digital forensics and investigative methodology

NTRLNK / 06

Methods forevidence in motion

The NTRLNK Research Library presents academic papers and scholarly analysis by Dr. Odd on digital evidence, forensic examination, investigative reasoning, and emerging systems whose actions must remain reconstructable.

Scholarly work for evidence that is becoming more technical, distributed, and autonomous.

The NTRLNK Research Library brings together work for researchers, investigators, students, attorneys, technologists, and other professionals confronting questions of digital evidence, forensic examination, investigative reasoning, and sound investigative method.

The papers examine both established practice and emerging problems. The collection considers how evidence should be preserved, attributed, contextualized, and tested when software tools, confidential computing, or autonomous systems complicate the traditional investigative record.

Every paper is available as a complete PDF document. Publication pages keep the author, project DOI, ORCID, title, subtitle, and document access together so the library reads as a coherent body of work rather than a list of files.

02 / Complete collection

Five papers. One evolving investigative problem space.

Select a paper to open its publication page and complete PDF document.

03 / Research terrain

Recurring questions across law, systems, and evidence.

01

Defense investigation

The changing role of private and defense investigators within a modern criminal-justice system shaped by digital records and specialized evidence.

02

Forensic provenance

How tool-using AI agents can preserve authority-aware records of what acted, under whose authority, and through which evidentiary steps.

03

Falsification-first method

An investigative methodology that actively tests the first account and competing explanations in AI-augmented digital forensics.

04

Confidential computing

Forensic readiness for confidential virtual machines where protected execution complicates independent verification and later reconstruction.

05

Autonomous software

Counterfactual reconstruction for determining how autonomous AI agents acted and whether a different condition would have produced a different result.

04 / Author and identifiers

James Allister Odd, Ph.D.

Project DOI
10.17605/OSF.IO/EJGH9
ORCID
0009-0008-2976-6313
View leadership profile